|
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 100,332840255089 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 5,91218063594732 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 6,62046741396308 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 161,570838903776 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 158,812033370377 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 98,5293619997391 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 34,0648561505765 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 41,1216877306079 | 20220328 |
| Pflanzenlänge (Halm, Ähre und Grannen) | NA | 105 | 19990623 |
| Blühdatum [Tage] | Number of days since 1 January of the running year | 150 | 19990531 |
| Aussaatdatum [Tage] | days after 1st January | 272 | 19980930 |