|
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 102,718353951402 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 5,17065489856307 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 5,09919217703992 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 159,551393804697 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 157,843516192406 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 118,850653040714 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 54,1495346404759 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 53,7224239677909 | 20220328 |
| Pflanzenlänge (Halm, Ähre und Grannen) | NA | 130 | 20130731 |
| Blühdatum [Tage] | Number of days since 1 January of the running year | 162 | 20130612 |
| Aussaatdatum [Tage] | days after 1st January | 274 | 20121001 |