|
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 122,026763077389 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 4,02909979217389 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 3,64225014718333 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 165,073607293629 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 162,56715327218 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 97,878895891269 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 45,5133776105671 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 46,3643560802278 | 20220328 |
| Pflanzenlänge (Halm, Ähre und Grannen) | NA | 105 | 20100727 |
| Blühdatum [Tage] | Number of days since 1 January of the running year | 164 | 20100614 |
| Aussaatdatum [Tage] | days after 1st January | 277 | 20091005 |