|
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 101,335386541373 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 4,88484535227843 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Gelbrostresistenz (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted yellow rust resistance given as a score ranging from 1 to 9. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 5,61114219487635 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 163,451791113419 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Blütezeit (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted flowering time given in days after January 1st. The genomic prediciton was performed with a GSA-RRBLUP model involvig admixture as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 160,72472331557 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagte Pflanzenhöhe (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted plant height given given in cm. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 109,470293292024 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 46,7402239185104 | 20220328 |
| Vorhergesagtes Tausendkorngewicht (genomische Vorhersage) | Predicted thousand grain weight given in g. The genomic predicition was performed with an EG-BLUP model as described in Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model (Berkner et al., DOI:10.1007/s00122-022-04227-4). | 48,8066276897214 | 20220328 |
| Pflanzenlänge (Halm, Ähre und Grannen) | NA | 115 | 20100727 |
| Blühdatum [Tage] | Number of days since 1 January of the running year | 167 | 20100617 |
| Aussaatdatum [Tage] | days after 1st January | 277 | 20091005 |